SangsLegal News The party who provides an incorrect address during proceedings is unable to argue against improper arbitration notice under section 21 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act:Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court has recently ruled that the party who provides an incorrect address during proceedings is unable to argue against improper arbitration notice under section 21 A&C.The court observed that a party cannot claim that they did not receive an arbitration notice under Section 21 of the Arbitration borse firmate imitazioni perfette and Conciliation Act, 1996 due to providing an incorrect address in the proceedings.

SangsLegal News In Favor of Registered Adoption Deed: Karnataka High Court Holds Presumption of Validity, No Strict Proof Needed

SangsLegal News The contribution of a homemaker in monetary value is that of a family member who contributes financially to the household :Supreme Court

While adjudicating a case under the Motor Vehicles Act of 1988, the Supreme Court remarked that quantifying the contribution of a homemaker in monetary value is a challenging task. The court praised such contributions as "high order and invaluable" and emphasized the equal importance of a homemaker's role within a family, comparing it to that of a family member who contributes financially to the household.

SangsLegal News A blank cheque leaf is voluntarily signed by the drawer is presumed to have been issued in fulfillment of a legally binding debt under NI Act: Supreme Court

According to Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, the Supreme Court has confirmed that when a blank cheque leaf is voluntarily signed by the drawer and given to the payee for a specific payment, it is presumed to have been issued in fulfillment of a legally binding debt.

SangsLegal News A property bought by a husband in the name of his homemaker wife, who has no independent source of income is considered a family property: Allahabad High Court

The Allahabad High Court ruled that a property bought by a husband in the name of his homemaker wife, who has no independent source of income, is considered a family property. The Court stated that it is customary and usual for Hindu husbands to acquire properties in their wives' names. The Court noted that in the absence of evidence proving that the property was acquired with the wife's income, it is presumed to have been purchased by the husband with his own earnings.