SangsLegal News Andhra Pradesh High Court : Policy Holder's Family Not Covered in Third-Party Vehicle Accident Insurance Claim

The Andhra Pradesh High Court has ruled that in the case of motor vehicle accidents, third-party insurance claims will not offer protection to the omega replica family members of the policy holder.

SangsLegal News Employers must provide maternity benefits even if the duration of the benefits extends beyond the contractual employment period

The Supreme Court recently held that employers must provide maternity benefits even if the duration of the benefits extends beyond the contractual employment period. The court asserted that these benefits can persist beyond the duration of the contractual agreement. As per the mandate, the employer is prada tasche türkei required to dispense maternity benefits as outlined in Sections 5 and 8 of The Maternity Benefits Act, 1961, and make the payout within a 3-month window.

SangsLegal News Confirm if a case projects a culpable homicide that does not amount to murder :Supreme Court

The Supreme Court stated that it's a responsibility of the Sessions Court to conduct a thorough review and assessment to confirm if a case projects a culpable homicide that does not amount to murder, prior to initiating the trial of an individual accused of murder.

SangsLegal News A revocation petition under Section 64 of the Patents Act does not constitute a suit

 The Delhi High Court has ruled that a revocation petition under Section 64 of the Patents Act does not constitute a suit replica handbags within the definition of Section 10 of the Civil Procedure Code (CPC).

SangsLegal News Supreme Court is questioning the 1992 precedent

 The Supreme Court is questioning the 1992 precedent that states police custody should apply to the total duration of investigation, lasting 15 days: a potential variant interpretation.The Supreme Court has raised queries about the interpretation of the 1992 judgment in the case of CBI vs. Anupam J. Kulkarni during the review of the Senthil Balaji case. This judgment states that law enforcement or investigative agencies aren't permitted to request the accused's custody after the first 15 days post-arrest.