Stay Informed: Your One-Stop Hub for All Current Legal News Updates
SangsLegal News The right to property under Article 300A of the Constitution also applies to individuals who are not citizens of India: Supreme Court |
According to the Supreme Court, the right to property under Article 300A of the Constitution applies not only to Indian citizens but also to individuals who are not citizens of India. The term "person" in Article 300-A includes both legal entities and non-Indian citizens. |
SangsLegal News Passport authorities are not permitted to refuse re-issuing or renewing passports for individuals with pending criminal cases that are under investigation: Karnataka High Court |
The Karnataka High Court has ruled that passport authorities are not permitted to refuse re-issuing or renewing passports for individuals with pending criminal cases that are still under investigation prada tasche türkei and have not yet taken cognizance of the offence. |
SangsLegal News The party who provides an incorrect address during proceedings is unable to argue against improper arbitration notice under section 21 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act:Delhi High Court |
The Delhi High Court has recently ruled that the party who provides an incorrect address during proceedings is unable to argue against improper arbitration notice under section 21 A&C.The court observed that a party cannot claim that they did not receive an arbitration notice under Section 21 of the Arbitration borse firmate imitazioni perfette and Conciliation Act, 1996 due to providing an incorrect address in the proceedings. |
SangsLegal News In Favor of Registered Adoption Deed: Karnataka High Court Holds Presumption of Validity, No Strict Proof Needed |
The Karnataka High Court has ruled that in cases concerning the Hindu Adoption & Maintenance Act, the presumption of validity operates in favor of registered adoption deeds. The court emphasized that strict proof is not required in such omega replica instances.
|
SangsLegal News The contribution of a homemaker in monetary value is that of a family member who contributes financially to the household :Supreme Court |
While adjudicating a case under the Motor Vehicles Act of 1988, the Supreme Court remarked that quantifying the contribution of a homemaker in monetary value is a challenging task. The court praised such contributions as "high order and invaluable" and emphasized the equal importance of a homemaker's role within a family, comparing it to that of a family member who contributes financially to the household. |